Honest, evidence-based answers to your hardest questions about faith
✨ Common Objections FAQ • PDF • Free Download
Your job isn't to "win" conversations. Your job is to provide honest, evidence-based answers and let people draw their own conclusions.
What people mean when they say this: 'I've never experienced God personally', 'There's no scientific proof', 'I don't find the arguments convincing', 'Evidence for God isn't empirically testable'. These are legitimate epistemological questions.
"The universe began to exist. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause. Therefore, the universe must have a cause—most reasonably, God."
— Dr. William Lane Craig
"The probabilities are so astronomically against random chance causing the necessary conditions for life that it's more rational to believe in God."
— Dr. Dinesh D'Souza
"If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world."
— C.S. Lewis
"The Resurrection of Jesus is the most attested fact in ancient history by historical-critical standards."
— Dr. Gary Habermas
People demand different types of evidence: Scientific/Empirical (measurable, repeatable), Historical (testimony, documents), Philosophical (logical arguments), Personal Experience (subjective but meaningful), and Circumstantial (convergence of multiple evidences). God's existence may not be scientifically provable, but that doesn't mean there's no evidence.
What people mean: 'Evolution explains life without God', 'Natural laws explain everything', 'Science is about evidence, religion is about faith'. But science and faith address different questions.
"Science is not threatened by God; it is enhanced. God is most certainly not threatened by science; He made it all possible."
— Dr. Francis Collins (Human Genome Project Director)
Common examples include: genealogy differences (Matthew vs Luke), trial timelines (Gospel accounts), numbers (census figures, army sizes). But these have reasonable explanations.
"Not one alleged Gospel contradiction has withstood close scrutiny and remained a genuine problem."
— Dr. Craig Blomberg
This objection assumes original manuscripts are needed to trust the Bible. But we don't have originals for ANY ancient document—yet we trust Caesar, Plato, Homer.
| Document | Manuscripts | Earliest Copy | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Testament | 5,800+ | 25-50 years | 99.5% |
| Homer's Iliad | 643 | 400 years | 95% |
| Caesar's Gallic Wars | 10 | 900 years | ??% |
| Plato | 7 | 1,200 years | ??% |
"The wealth of manuscript evidence for the New Testament is unparalleled in ancient literature. We can reconstruct the original with over 99% certainty."
— Dr. Daniel Wallace
Skeptics argue Jesus was just a 'good teacher' who never claimed divinity. But the evidence shows otherwise.
"The idea that Jesus never claimed to be God is historically untenable. The evidence from all four Gospels is overwhelming."
— Dr. Michael Licona
CS Lewis's Trilemma: Jesus was either a liar, lunatic, or Lord. No middle ground exists.
Dive deeper into the evidence for Christianity with these related resources
Comprehensive answers to the most common questions about Christianity with full explanations
Historical, archaeological, and scientific evidence examined with scholarly rigor
7-day scientific approach to investigating God's existence through personal experience
Access the complete skeptic journey guide in one comprehensive PDF. Everything you need for this stage, all in one place.
Continue your journey of investigation with these evidence-based resources
From Kyle Lauriano:
“These are the objections I hear most often—from friends, in YouTube comments, in my own head. I've done my best to answer each one honestly, without dodging the hard parts. If your question isn't here, reach out. I'll give you a real answer.”